Replacement airbox?

LD609315

New member
I find the stock airbox too restricted. Did anyone modify or adapted free flowing torque tube?

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

LD609315

New member
Because more air in quickly gives more power and quicker revving engines. Historically Polaris restricted some of Victory big bore bikes air boxes to meet emission targets. Flip side of fitting a free flowing exhaust.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Blue1

Active member
I understand the flow issues.

Exhaust is restricted because of sound output.

Intake may or may not be restricted; it is helpful to know that Polaris has this tendency with the big twins, but that doesn't necessarily make it so with the FTR. Completely different engine.

I am waiting as information becomes available from tuners and others that are in a position to investigate and provide solutions. That may take several more months, as I haven't even seen another FTR in the street in the ten weeks I've had mine.

I have been told that the just released K&N filter only adds 1-2 HP on the top, not worth the cleaning and oiling of a K&N every year, IMO.

Of course, that doesn't prove that a different intake arrangement as you suggest wouldn't work.
 

Max Kool

Well-known member
I find the stock airbox too restricted. Did anyone modify or adapted free flowing torque tube?

Can you explain what you mean by "too restricted"? In what way?

All the way up to 7500 rpm the airbox does a great job of tuning the engine for bottom and midrange torque, I love the punch it has basically everywhere. I'd be too afraid to loose some of that just to get an extra 10hp or so in the top of the rev range. I think our best bet is waiting for a specialist to change the airbox in a way that doesn't screw up the tuning of the current design. Just don't remove the snorkels in the front, it runs worse without them.
 

Blue1

Active member
All the way up to 7500 rpm the airbox does a great job of tuning the engine for bottom and midrange torque, I love the punch it has basically everywhere. I'd be too afraid to loose some of that just to get an extra 10hp or so in the top of the rev range. I think our best bet is waiting for a specialist to change the airbox in a way that doesn't screw up the tuning of the current design. Just don't remove the snorkels in the front, it runs worse without them.
[/QUOTE]

I agree with Max.
 

Blue1

Active member
In retrospect, after viewing dyno charts, there may be something to the airbox as being an issue.

But pure flow from a less-restrictive air filter is usually not as beneficial as the flow harmonics/ram effect (intake and exhaust) that proper engineering provides.

Unfortunately, manufacturing and packaging issues may compromise airbox shape (and exhaust as well).

Both Scout and FTR share a torque dip from 4000 rpm to 5500 rpm. Scout aftermarket intakes seem to fill this dip, but that is on the Scout dyno runs. Note that the Scout runs about 25 hp short of the FTR, with the same basic engine architecture.

Nothing currently, to my knowledge, is available for the FTR, as far as airboxes or air box mods.
 
Top